Filter
Top Products
1 of 22 Revision Nov 2008
Product Description Weight g/m2 Coating type Size Application
Number of
sheets run
Image
Quality
Image
Permanence
Runnability
Auto
Duplex
Date of
test
Notes
Xerox Guaranteed Media
Alternative
Uncoated
Klippan Intensive
70 gsm Uncoated 330 x 560 mm Newspaper advert 6000 No May-05
Only to be used in simplex mode.Due to the very yellow colour of the paper printed colours may look
different. Top tray. Yellow dye migrates to fuser agent reservoir.
Xerox Colotech + 120 gsm
Promail Plus 80 gsm Uncoated 315 x 440mm Full colour 200 Yes Sep-07 Small quantity tested, caution should be used with this media. Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
Trophee 80 gsm Uncoated 315 x 440mm Full colour 200 Yes Sep-07 Small quantity tested, caution should be used with this media. Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
Igepa (perforated media)
80 gsm Uncoated A3 Full colour 5000 Yes Jun-07
Grainy, mottled prints,Folded corners,poor stacking,Build up of contamination in fuser is rapid and
service intervention is required regularly.
Navigator 80 gsm Uncoated 315 x 440mm Full colour 200 Yes Sep-07 Poor Print quality,High post fuser curl,poor stacking, contamination in fuser system Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
MaxiPreprint
80 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full colour 3000 Yes Dec-08 Poor toner transfer on 2nd side, marginal toner adhesion, contamination on fuser system. Service risk Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
Multioffset 80 gsm Uncoated SRA3 reports 2000 Yes Aug-04 Xerox Colotech + 120 gsm
Druco Pre -perforated
80 gsm Uncoated 319 x 489 Full colour 3000 Yes Feb-08
Graphic and high area coverage files may look grainy. Regular cleaning of the fuser system will be
required.
Xerox Colotech + 90gsm
Color Copy 80 80 gsm Uncoated A4 Full colour 3000 Yes Jan-02 Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
HVO 80 GSM Uncoated 315 x 440mm Full colour 3000 Yes Sep-07 Grainy prints, poor stacking, long runs will need service interventions in the fuser.
SVH Schmidt Paper 80gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full colour 3000 Yes Jul-05 sheets creasing, poor stacking Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
Rapport Matt 80 gsm Uncoated 521x364mm Full colour 2500 Yes Jun-05 Print Mottle evident. Low area coverage jobs only. Stacking not very good. Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
Graphic Print 90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full colour 1000 Yes May-07 Grainy prints ,contamination in Fuser Xerox Colour Impressions 90gsm
Navigator 90 gsm Uncoated 315 x 440mm Full colour 200 Yes Sep-07 Poor Print quality,High post fuser curl,poor stacking, contamination in fuser system Xerox Colour Impressions 90 gsm
Koehler
90 gsm Uncoated 320 x 460mm Full colour 3000 Yes Jul-08
Print quality marginal under default settings, contamination build up on fuser system requires regular
maintenance
Xerox Colour Impressions 90 gsm
Arctic Volume
90 gsm Uncoated 360 x 500mm Full colour 3000 Yes Mar-09
Print quality marginal under default settings, contamination build up on fuser system requires regular
maintenance
Xerox Colour Impressions 90 gsm
IP Laser Duo
90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full colour 8000 Yes Jul-07
Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a short run
POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
Copy speed
90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Travel Document 3000 Yes Jan-03
Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a short run
POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
UBS offset 90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Reports 2000 Yes Jan-06 Folded corners in stacker caused jams Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
IQ Smooth 90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 reports 3000 Yes Nov-04 Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
ColorCopy 90
90 gsm Uncoated Several 10000 Yes Nov-02 This media may have a mottled appearance due to poor paper formation (image density and Gloss). Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
Bio Set 90 gsm Uncoated 315 x 440mm Full colour 200 Yes Sep-07 Small quantity tested, caution should be used with this media. Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
Clairefontaine 90 gsm Uncoated
229x362
3000 Yes Jul-08 Print quality is grainy and not suitable for high quality work. Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
Schleipen Werkdruck
90 gsm Uncoated
229x356mm
210x297mm
3000 Yes Dec-05 Print quality is grainy and not suitable for high quality work. Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
Chamois Alster Digital 90 gsm Uncoated
229x362
3000 Yes Jul-08 Contamination on the fuser roll system. Potential service risk. Xerox Colotech + 90 gsm
Ballarpur Maplitho
90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full Colour 3000 Yes Dec-06
Print quality mottled and grainy.Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a
short run POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Alabaster
90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full Colour 3000 Yes Dec-06
Print quality mottled and grainy.Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a
short run POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Print Speed offset
90 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Travel Document 3000 Yes Dec-06
Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a short run
POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
4CC 100 100 gsm Uncoated Jan-02 Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Color Copy 100 100 gsm Uncoated A4 Full colour 3000 Yes Jan-02 Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
DCP 100 (4hole punched) 100 gsm Uncoated A4 Forms 2500 Yes May-08 Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
DCP 100 (3hole punched) 100 gsm Uncoated A4 Forms 2500 Yes May-08 Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
DCP 100 (2hole punched) 100 gsm Uncoated A4 Forms 2500 Yes May-08 Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Scandia 2000
100 gsm Uncoated SRA3 1000 Yes Jun-04
Dries the fuser up quickly causing fuser roll contamination, leading to fuser offset and replacement.
POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Copy speed
100 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Travel Document 3000 Yes Jan-03
Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a short run
POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
PrintSpeed Offset
100 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Brochure 3000 Yes Jun-04
Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a short run
POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Take2 Offset 100 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Brochure 3000 Yes Nov-08 Poor Image quality, poor runability, contamination on fuser rolls. Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Select 115 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Gov. Report 3000 Yes Feb-03 Xerox Colotech + 120 gsm
Real Digital Smooth 115 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full Colour 3000 Yes Sep-06 Poor toner adhesion Xerox Colotech + 120 gsm
Iprint
120 gsm Uncoated 320 x 460mm Full Colour 500 Yes Jul-07 Grainy Prints, Creasing. Small quantity tested, caution should be used when running this media
PrintSpeed Offset
120 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Brochure 3000 Yes Dec-06
Contamination on the fuser roll and offsetting on prints after a short run
POTENTIAL SERVICE RISK
Xerox Colotech + 100 gsm
Trophee 120 gsm Uncoated 315 x 440mm Full colour 200 Yes Sep-07 Small quantity tested, caution should be used with this media. Xerox Colour Impressions 80 gsm
Natural Evolution White 120 gsm Uncoated SRA3 Full Colour 3000 Yes Sep-06 Poor print qaulity of some colours Xerox Colotech + 120 gsm
Color Copy 120 120 gsm Uncoated A4 Full colour 3000 Yes Feb-02 Xerox Colotech + 120 gsm
Not Recommended
Not Recommended
iGen3 Digital Production Press Non-Xerox Tested Media List - Europe - April 2010
Green - Good test results, purchase a small quantity to insure expectations are met.
Yellow - Customer should validate the limitations are acceptable for their application.
Not Recommended
Xerox makes no guarantees or warranties, either expressed or implied, concerning the performance, use, consistency or replacement of non-Xerox branded media or throughput products. Customers should inquire directly of their paper distributor or manufacturer for any guarantees they may offer. When purchasing a particular media
product for the first time, customers are advised to purchase small quantities to insure that expectations are met. For guaranteed best performance, use digitally optimized paper and specialty media from Xerox Supplies.
The Non-Xerox Tested Media List contains non-Xerox branded paper and specialty media. Xerox has tested many media products on the Xerox iGen3 Digital Production Press and based on such testing have published this list of tested media products which may or may not, at the time of and based upon such testing, meet Xerox performance criteria. No subsequent testing has been done and
therefore no determination can be made as to whether or not such products would currently fail or pass Xerox performance criteria.
Not Recommended